When everything feels urgent, it’s easy to get overwhelmed. Coding audits can produce dozens—even hundreds—of findings. But not all findings carry equal weight, and treating every error like a crisis leads to team burnout, misdirected training efforts, and stalled improvement initiatives.
Here’s how to make your audit findings work for you—not against your bandwidth:
Not all errors carry the same weight. Focus first on findings with potential to affect reimbursement, quality metrics, or public reporting—such as DRG changes, missed CC/MCCs, or incorrect POA indicators.
Singular errors happen. But repeated issues—across the same coder, department, or case type—can point to deeper documentation or workflow gaps that need attention.
Low-risk or low-frequency errors don’t always require immediate action. Flagging everything equally can lead to wasted time and burnout—especially when the issues don’t have a material impact.
Audit results can guide more focused education efforts. If certain types of errors keep surfacing, especially within a particular specialty or among specific coders, use those insights to tailor your training strategy.
The value of an audit isn’t in eliminating every error—it’s in making meaningful improvements over time. Prioritizing findings helps maintain coder engagement and supports smarter process changes.
That’s exactly why we built Atom Audit—to make prioritization part of the process.
With customizable severity levels, trend reporting, and filters by error type, service line, or coder, Atom Audit helps you focus on what matters most. No more sifting through spreadsheets or trying to guess what deserves your attention first. When your audit platform is built for clarity, not just compliance, you can finally turn findings into focused action—without overwhelming your team.
👉 Ready to simplify your audit workflow? Schedule a demo of Atom Audit.